But the Second Wreck Didn’t Increase Symptom Severity….

We see this a lot. A client is involved in a wreck. They report symptoms of 5/10. Then they’re involved in another wreck. Symptom scores stay at 5/10.

The insurance company for the driver from the second wreck says: It looks like the second wreck didn’t injure your client. That’s an easy and superficially appealing position. But what it doesn’t take into account is the fact that damage from the second collision can significantly delay healing or make symptoms permanent.

The key is distinguishing between intensity of symptoms and duration of recovery.

There are two variables in the equation. And insurers focus on just one.

The length of one leg doesn't tell you the length of the hypotenuse.

A second injury—especially to the brain or musculoskeletal system—may not immediately increase the level of symptoms but it can still meaningfully prolong how long those symptoms last.

Here’s why:

A second injury may not increase symptom severity but can make symptoms last longer because it interferes with ongoing repair processes, prolongs metabolic or inflammatory cascades, and reduces physiologic reserve. The result is a delayed recovery curve without necessarily producing a higher peak of symptom intensity.